Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Topics in Antiviral Medicine ; 31(2):95, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2319250

ABSTRACT

Background: Omicron lineages, including BA.1 and BA.2, emerged following mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, displaced previous SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern worldwide, and gave rise to sublineages that continue to spread among humans. Previous research has shown that Omicron lineages exhibit a decreased propensity for lower respiratory tract (lung) infection compared to ancestral SARS-CoV-2, which may explain the decreased pathogenicity associated with Omicron infections. Nonetheless, Omicron lineages exhibit an unprecedented transmissibility in humans, which until now has been solely attributed to escape from vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies. Method(s): We comprehensively analyzed BA1 and BA2 infection in primary human nasal epithelial cells cultured at the air-liquid interface, which recapitulates the physiological architecture of the nasal epithelium in vivo. Meanwhile we also took advantage of the VSV-based pseudovirus decorated with different Spike variants. Result(s): In primary human nasal epithelial cells cultured at the air-liquid interface, which recapitulates the physiological architecture of the nasal epithelium in vivo, BA.1 and BA.2 exhibited enhanced infectivity relative to ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Using VSV-based pseudovirus decorated with different Spike variants, we found that increased infectivity conferred by Omicron Spike is due to superior attachment and entry into nasal epithelial cells. In contrast to ancestral SARS-CoV-2, invasion of nasal epithelia by Omicron occurred via the cell surface and endosomal routes of entry and was accompanied by elevated induction of type-I interferons, indicative of a robust innate immune response. Furthermore, BA.1 was less sensitive to inhibition by the antiviral state elicited by type-I and type-III interferons, and this was recapitulated by pseudovirus bearing BA.1 and BA.2 Spike proteins. Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that the constellation of Spike mutations unique to Omicron allow for increased adherence to nasal epithelia, flexible usage of virus entry pathways, and interferon resistance. These findings inform our understanding of how Omicron evolved elevated transmissibility between humans despite a decreased propensity to infect the lower respiratory tract. Additionally, the interferon insensitivity of the Omicron Spike-mediated entry process may explain why Omicron lineages lost the capacity to antagonize interferon pathways compared to ancestral SARS-CoV-2.

2.
Topics in Antiviral Medicine ; 30(1 SUPPL):7-8, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1880864

ABSTRACT

Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised individuals has been associated with prolonged virus shedding and the development of novel viral variants. Rapamycin and rapamycin analogs (rapalogs, including everolimus, temsirolimus, and ridaforolimus) are FDA-approved for use as mTOR inhibitors in multiple clinical settings, including cancer and autoimmunity, but a common side effect of these drugs is immunosuppression and increased susceptibility to infection. Immune impairment caused by rapalog use is traditionally attributed to their impacts on T cell signaling and cytokine production. Methods: We used replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 and HIV pseudotyped with betacoronavirus Spike proteins to assess how rapalog pretreatment of cells ex vivo and rodent animals in vivo impacts susceptibility to Spike-mediated infection. Results: We show that exposure to rapalogs increases cellular susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection by antagonizing components of the constitutive and interferon-induced cell-intrinsic immune response. Pre-treatment of cells (including human lung epithelial cells and primary human small airway epithelial cells) with rapalogs promoted the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection by facilitating Spike-mediated virus entry. Rapalogs also boosted infection mediated by Spike from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV in addition to hemagglutinin of influenza A virus and glycoprotein from vesicular stomatitis virus, suggesting that rapalogs downmodulate antiviral defenses that pose a common barrier to these viral fusion proteins. By identifying one rapalog (ridaforolimus) that lacks this function, we demonstrate that the extent to which rapalogs promote virus entry is linked to their capacity to trigger the lysosomal degradation of IFITM2 and IFITM3, intrinsic inhibitors of virus-cell membrane fusion. Mechanistically, rapalogs that promote virus entry inhibit the mTOR-mediated phosphorylation of TFEB, a transcription factor controlling lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal degradation pathways such as autophagy. In contrast, TFEB phosphorylation by mTOR was not inhibited by ridaforolimus. In the hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, injection of rapamycin four hours prior to virus exposure resulted in elevated virus titers in lungs, accelerated weight loss, and decreased survival. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that preexisting use of certain rapalogs may elevate host susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease by activating a lysosome-mediated suppression of intrinsic immunity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL